← All use cases
Finance
M&A target screening
Multi-criteria selection of a pursuit portfolio while target lists and valuation models stay sealed.
- Who
- A corporate development team or a deal team evaluating 50+ potential targets in a strategic refresh.
- The problem
- Multi-criteria optimization across target selection — financial fit, strategic alignment, antitrust exposure, integration complexity, valuation, management compatibility. Selecting the right portfolio of pursuits, not just the best single target, is where value is created.
- What ArcaQ does
- QUBO encoding of the screening problem with constraints on aggregate exposure, sector concentration, and due-diligence resource intensity.
- Expected result (published benchmarks)
- Published case studies of structured target-portfolio selection show 20–40% reduction in due-diligence cycle count by focusing on the optimal subset earlier.
- Why confidentiality matters
- Target lists, valuation models, and strategic rationale are extremely sensitive — disclosure to even an unrelated third party can affect market pricing. They never leave attested compute.
- Tier fit
- Reserve.
The performance ranges below are drawn from published academic and industry benchmarks for the relevant problem class — QAOA portfolio-optimization studies, VQE chemistry benchmarks, and quantum-annealing logistics case studies. They are not ArcaQ measurements. Results vary substantially with problem size, constraint density, and the specific algorithm and hardware used. ArcaQ-specific results will be published after hardware validation.